Quartet’ is an R package that calculates the quartet distance between two trees (Estabrook et al. 1985), a measure of their similarity based on the number of shared four-taxon subtrees.

The quartet distance outperforms a number of widely used tree distances (e.g. the Robinson–Foulds, path, and rearrangement distances) against a number theoretical and practical measures (Steel & Penny 1993; Smith 2020), and is particularly valuable in the construction of tree spaces (Smith 2021).

‘Quartet’ uses the ‘tqDist’ algorithm (Brodal et al. 2004; Sand et al. 2014). Unlike many other implementations, it distinguishes between quartets that are contradicted by one tree, and quartets that are simply absent due to a lack of resolution (i.e. the presence of polytomies; see Smith 2019). ‘Quartet’ makes this distinction in both the quartet metric (function QuartetStatus()) and the partition metric (i.e. Robinson-Foulds distance; function SplitStatus()).

Using the package

Install and load the library from CRAN as follows:

install.packages('Quartet')
library('Quartet')

For the latest features, install the development version:

if(!require(devtools)) install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github('ms609/Quartet')

You will need Rtools installed in order to build the development version from source.

View the function reference and basic usage instructions.

Known limitations

Quartet supports trees with up to 477 leaves. Larger trees contain more quartets than can be represented by R’s signed 32-bit integers. The underlying ‘tqDist’ library may handle trees with up to 568 leaves, and 64-bit integer representations could increase this number further.
Making either of these improvements within the R package would require substantial additional work, but could be implemented – do file an issue if this would be useful to you.

References

  • Brodal G.S., Fagerberg R., Pedersen C.N.S. 2004. Computing the quartet distance between evolutionary trees in time O(n log n). Algorithmica 38:377–395.

  • Estabrook G.F., McMorris F.R., Meacham C.A. 1985. Comparison of undirected phylogenetic trees based on subtrees of four evolutionary units. Syst. Zool. 34:193–200.

  • Sand A., Holt M.K., Johansen J., Brodal G.S., Mailund T., Pedersen C.N.S. 2014. tqDist: a library for computing the quartet and triplet distances between binary or general trees. Bioinformatics 30:2079–2080. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu157

  • Smith, M.R. 2019. Bayesian and parsimony approaches reconstruct informative trees from simulated morphological datasets. Biol. Lett. 15:20180632. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0632

  • Smith, M.R. 2020. Information theoretic generalized Robinson–Foulds metrics for comparing phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 36:5007–5013. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa614

  • Smith, M.R. 2021. The importance of methodology when analysing landscapes of phylogenetic trees. Forthcoming.

  • Steel, M. and Penny, D. 1993. Distributions of tree comparison metrics: some new results. Syst. Biol. 42: 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/42.2.126

Please note that the ‘Quartet’ project is released with a Contributor Code of Conduct. By contributing to this project, you agree to abide by its terms.